In court, the prosecution framed "A" as reckless. He was depicted as a saboteur who had introduced unknown variables into municipal systems. In his defense, the old lab notebooks that Mara had smuggled out of a discarded server were entered as evidence—diagrams of sensor triage, ethical notes on autonomous consent, and minutes from a meeting where engineers had argued to keep certain failsafes mandatory. The judge, eyes tired, asked a simple question: was human safety better served by a centrally administered, updateable driver, or by a layer insisting on local verification?